C’est une évolution majeure pour le nommage sur Internet.
Depuis jeudi 6 mai, il est possible de déposer un nom de domaine en caractère non-latin.
Auparavant, il était juste possible d’écrire les noms de domaine en caractères non latins. Mais les extensions ne suivaient pas.
Quatre premiers pays – Égypte, Arabie Saoudite, Émirats Arabes Unis et Russie – peuvent désormais proposer des extensions correspondant à leur zone géographique avec des caractères arabes ou cyrilliques.
Ils pourront ainsi disposer de leur propre nommage à l’image du « .fr » en France et les internautes de ces pays pourront écrire des noms de domaine « entièrement de droite à gauche » si besoin est.
Preuve que l’initiative séduit : 21 autres pays, dont la Chine, la Jordanie, le Sri Lanka et la Thaïlande, ont demandé à l’organisation américaine en charge de coordonner la gestion des éléments techniques du DNS de mettre en place leur extension dans 11 langues non-latines différentes.
Il aura fallu près de deux ans à l’Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) pour passer de la théorie à la pratique.
Plus de la moitié des 1,6 milliard d’internautes utilisent des langues qui ne sont pas basées sur des écritures en caractères latins, selon l’ICANN.
Loading ...
Old School~ Frank Blue youre my boy
Just wish to say your article is as surprising. The clearness for your submit is simply nice and i could assume you are an expert in this subject. Well with your permission let me to take hold of your RSS feed to stay up to date with imminent post. Thanks a million and please keep up the gratifying work. Thanks So Much.
Hello there! I know this is somewhat off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this website? I’m getting tired of WordPress because I’ve had issues with hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform. I would be fantastic if you could point me in the direction of a good platform. Many thanks!
Wohh just what I was looking for, thanks for posting . « Study men, not historians. » by Harry S Truman. Best Regards.
Real excellent visual appeal on this site, I’d rate it 10 10.
The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.
The new Zune browser is surprisingly good, but not as good as the iPod’s. It works well, but isn’t as fast as Safari, and has a clunkier interface. If you occasionally plan on using the web browser that’s not an issue, but if you’re planning to browse the web alot from your PMP then the iPod’s larger screen and better browser may be important.
I’ll gear this review to 2 types of people: current Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and people trying to decide between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out there, like the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this gives you enough info to make an informed decision of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as well.)
I genuinely enjoy reading on this internet site , it holds wonderful content . « Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible. » by Lord Kelvin.
I see something really special in this website .